1. Sync-up with mainline scheduler code changes.
This is the first release of BMQ in v5.7, nothing new but the sync-up. Meanwhile, Project C has been started. In this kernel release cycle, BMQ will be refactored into Project C infrastructure. A lot things need to be decided in the next 2~3 weeks. Stay tuned.
Full kernel tree repository can be found at https://gitlab.com/alfredchen/linux-bmq
And all-in-one patch can be found at gitlab.
Bug report at https://gitlab.com/alfredchen/bmq/issues
Full kernel tree repository can be found at https://gitlab.com/alfredchen/linux-bmq
And all-in-one patch can be found at gitlab.
Bug report at https://gitlab.com/alfredchen/bmq/issues
Thank you very much.
ReplyDeleteHere comes a fix when enable PSI.
ReplyDeletehttps://gitlab.com/alfredchen/linux-bmq/-/commit/53c690361e12a1097383c7940471216a2f1b0d03
This will be include in next release.
Another missing sync-up fix
ReplyDeletehttps://gitlab.com/alfredchen/linux-bmq/-/commit/ad9eb862e06f395e846a2f2e084e5b0e7eb9ca4b
Many thanks for your great work!
ReplyDeleteJust a -- don't name it stupid, please -- short question:
Is the BMQ scheduler also suitable for cellphone kernels (Android, arm64)?
TIA,
Manuel
My raspberry pi2 runs 7*24 with BMQ&latest kernel release. So, it works for arm(also should work for arm64), but keep in mind that BMQ is design for interactivity, not for power-saving.
DeleteYeah, cool. Thank you to let me / us know so quickly.
DeleteI Just want to see the difference. :-D
Looks like my cellphone is faster, even without BMQ, than my old notebook.
In my experience it comes to the same sum: If you don't waste time with slowly loading programs, the less power you would waste at the end.
But I won't blame you for possible power-saving drawbacks.
:-)
Manuel