tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post6064756718631323449..comments2024-02-29T00:33:07.382-08:00Comments on Alfred Chen's Blog: VRQ 0.96c releaseAlfred Chenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03164306846702841944noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-40884821369503387582017-07-07T08:03:28.370-07:002017-07-07T08:03:28.370-07:00I'm running this on i7 machine and no stabilit...I'm running this on i7 machine and no stability issues either.<br />@Alfred, regarding my problem with efficiency on full load I might have stumbled on a symptom. With the y-cruncher benchmark I noticed that the results are almost identical to cfs, but there is a huge difference in time it took to "Reserving Working Memory... ". Maybe its not scheduling, but memory allocation problem. I will try to look into on how to test this theory.<br /><br />BR, Dzon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-34545511592751225552017-07-06T17:22:59.148-07:002017-07-06T17:22:59.148-07:00@Eduardo
I'd take care those compilation issue...@Eduardo<br />I'd take care those compilation issue in 4.12 in next release. Those APIs are used to only be used in scheduler code.<br /><br />And BTW, your another post seems to be eaten by the lovly system, :)Alfred Chenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03164306846702841944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-87541540751248403172017-07-06T08:14:01.963-07:002017-07-06T08:14:01.963-07:00I got this while compiling (ubuntu 16.04, gcc-6.3)...I got this while compiling (ubuntu 16.04, gcc-6.3):<br /><br />kernel/livepatch/transition.c:288:18: error: storage size of ‘flags’ isn’t known<br /> struct rq_flags flags;<br /> ^~~~~<br />kernel/livepatch/transition.c:311:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘task_rq_lock’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]<br /> rq = task_rq_lock(task, &flags);<br /> ^~~~~~~~~~~~<br />kernel/livepatch/transition.c:313:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘task_running’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]<br /> if (task_running(rq, task) && task != current) {<br /> ^~~~~~~~~~~~<br />kernel/livepatch/transition.c:330:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘task_rq_unlock’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]<br /> task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &flags);<br /> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />kernel/livepatch/transition.c:288:18: warning: unused variable ‘flags’ [-Wunused-variable]<br /> struct rq_flags flags;<br /><br />I dunno why, meanwhile will compile a version for 4.11.<br /><br />Br, EduardoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-64565612582909648342017-07-05T13:48:47.843-07:002017-07-05T13:48:47.843-07:00Builds and boot ok on Ryzen machine. One kernel bu...Builds and boot ok on Ryzen machine. One kernel build without problems. Seems stable so far. Alfred, thanks for quick sync up.<br /><br />BR, Dzon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-35121304997805232442017-07-05T09:36:19.098-07:002017-07-05T09:36:19.098-07:00Merged into v4.12-pf1. Builds and boots OK.
Thank...Merged into v4.12-pf1. Builds and boots OK.<br /><br />Thanks.Oleksandr Natalenkohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12098091624630953604noreply@blogger.com