tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post1546412343912945671..comments2024-02-29T00:33:07.382-08:00Comments on Alfred Chen's Blog: BMQ v5.3.1 releaseAlfred Chenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03164306846702841944noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-17129209578994441612019-10-05T16:20:50.257-07:002019-10-05T16:20:50.257-07:00Thanks. Updated.Thanks. Updated.Alfred Chenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03164306846702841944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-61034247620261505812019-10-05T00:31:17.736-07:002019-10-05T00:31:17.736-07:00There's an error in link to "all-in-one&q...There's an error in link to "all-in-one" patch in the blog's notice. The correct is: https://gitlab.com/alfredchen/bmq/blob/master/5.3/bmq_v5.3.1.patchpavbaranovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14652612344662027902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-45151261910635470182019-10-04T07:31:29.800-07:002019-10-04T07:31:29.800-07:00I suppose that a very optimal solution would be to...I suppose that a very optimal solution would be to give the version number 5.X.rY, where:<br /><br />- 5.X - kernel line, which seems obvious<br /><br />- rY - for example r1, r2, r3 - release number, clearly and legibly separated. <br /><br />Example number:<br /><br />5.3.r2Lucjanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10907434803854252586noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-89111309355650148692019-10-04T07:30:27.943-07:002019-10-04T07:30:27.943-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Lucjanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10907434803854252586noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-22199317895548220782019-10-04T06:33:08.249-07:002019-10-04T06:33:08.249-07:00Good idea, let's begin from next release, ;)Good idea, let's begin from next release, ;)Alfred Chenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03164306846702841944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-21981734459758766002019-10-04T05:47:24.426-07:002019-10-04T05:47:24.426-07:00Having the two first numbers indicate kernel major...Having the two first numbers indicate kernel major is good. 5.3 for 5.3 kernel... easy.<br /><br />Using the same numbering as the kernel releases could however be somewhat confusing. Does it make it clear that 5.3.1 is for kernel release 5.3.2 or 5.3.12?<br /><br />What about: 5.3-1 instead? This way it is for 5.3 kernel, and release -1 regardless of what minor version the kernel release is.<br /><br />Nitpicking perhaps, your choice :)Sveinar Søplerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18401720133659243541noreply@blogger.com