tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post6672013992144711827..comments2024-02-29T00:33:07.382-08:00Comments on Alfred Chen's Blog: 4.5 VRQ test patch v4.5_0469_test0 updatedAlfred Chenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03164306846702841944noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-10949874690427306182016-05-20T03:08:01.690-07:002016-05-20T03:08:01.690-07:00Since you advided me some time ago I invoke the BO...Since you advided me some time ago I invoke the BOINC client as follows:<br />/sbin/startproc -u boinc -g boinc -l /var/log/boinc-client.log -s /usr/sbin/schedtool -n 19 -D -e /usr/bin/boinc-client --dir /var/lib/boinc --no_priority_change<br /><br />The advantage is, that the 2 child processes always get spawned as SCHED_IDLEPRIO and nice 19, differently from BOINC's default of SCHED_BATCH. It's what you've suggested for testing, some time ago.<br /><br />BR Manuel KrauseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-35209433689771668222016-05-19T19:26:12.682-07:002016-05-19T19:26:12.682-07:00And, what's the policy again for your WCG clie...And, what's the policy again for your WCG client tasks now? NORMAL or IDLE?Alfred Chenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03164306846702841944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-3029022861616762602016-05-19T19:03:50.592-07:002016-05-19T19:03:50.592-07:00Thanks for the updates. Good to hear that it works...Thanks for the updates. Good to hear that it works for you.<br />Let's see how it could be in 4.6 test branch.<br /><br />BR AlfredAlfred Chenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03164306846702841944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-19073701479094466412016-05-19T07:34:30.163-07:002016-05-19T07:34:30.163-07:00To make it short and understandable for other read...To make it short and understandable for other readers as I've emailed with Alfred in the meantime:<br />The failures/errors with the new -VRQtest version were caused by my own mistakes. I've had trashed the corresponding sources' folder with wrong patching sometimes before. A wonder that that mess compiled without issues.<br /><br />Now, after recreating sources and freshly patched, also this version works!<br /><br />My first experience with it: Much better than the previous -VRQtest0 (without the 2 new commits) regarding interactivity and frame drops, but I still see latency with mouse movement in KDE when having my WCG client tasks running in the background.<br /><br />BR Manuel Krause<br />Others are invited to test and see themselves. :-)<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-9004320859978619052016-05-17T06:55:27.802-07:002016-05-17T06:55:27.802-07:00Don't want to exceed patience, mine and yours....Don't want to exceed patience, mine and yours. Will send the posting to your email address.<br /><br />BR Manuel KrauseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2963790426029213933.post-54698882656773673352016-05-17T06:22:24.562-07:002016-05-17T06:22:24.562-07:00@Alfred:
I'm seem to not be allowed to post my...@Alfred:<br />I'm seem to not be allowed to post my comment with two call traces (as Anonymous).<br />Any ideas?<br /><br />BR Manuel KrauseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com